 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Forums | Media Gallery | Classifieds | Chat | Membership | Marketplace | How-Tos |
| |||||||
| Register | All Albums | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Performance Modifications Nose to tail modifications. Under the hood, behind the side sills, make your Snake FASTER/Handle Better...etc.!!! Sponsored by: Heffner Performance |
 |
06-26-2008, 02:30 PM
|
#16 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 217
|
Re: supercharger vs turbo
Quote:
It's a cog drive. It's supposed to be like that. Gotta love the blower-surge at idle!  |
|
|
|
|
06-28-2008, 07:59 PM
|
#17 |
|
TX VCA Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: See avatar above because you will not be able to read my plate from your distance behind me.
Posts: 243
|
Re: supercharger vs turbo
I will soon let you know which is better...
__________________
'06 Red Vert - Bone Stock  "making headlines, scaring passengers, and offending decent people on the street"
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2008, 03:15 AM
|
#18 |
|
Western Canada VCA Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nimpo Lake, BC
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: supercharger vs turbo
I think the differences are in what kind of power you want. Using a Roe feels like you fust installed a 1000 cubic inches of engine. The Roe is an easy instal and no frame chopping/removal required.
Paxton runs stock power at idle and makes big power at high rpms. The upper crossmember in front of engine needs to be removed. Much more time consuming instal. TT is like a Paxton except more expensive, a lot more. A huge amount of time required to instal as well as lots of cutting for all kits. Total exhuast change required. After 700rwhp you start breaking things, driveaxles, clutch, pistons, etc. Ted
__________________
Roe Supercharged 01 Sapphire GTS, M2 built 720rwhp. rest-mod 440 Duster 4sale, '92 IROC R/T 4sale, 71 340 Demon project 4sale. |
|
|
|
|
07-19-2008, 11:16 AM
|
#19 |
|
TX VCA Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: See avatar above because you will not be able to read my plate from your distance behind me.
Posts: 243
|
Re: supercharger vs turbo
My paxton was a beast...I just want more. PowerGreed?
__________________
'06 Red Vert - Bone Stock "making headlines, scaring passengers, and offending decent people on the street"
|
|
|
|
|
07-19-2008, 11:49 AM
|
#20 |
|
Viper Owner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 137
|
Re: supercharger vs turbo
I have the basic Paxton kit on my 02. Stock internals and fuel system at 545rwhp. Obviously headers and exhaust, but otherwise stock. $10,000 installed by Heffner. I've had my setup for 2 years now untouched with no problems, except a lot of heat soak and wanting more power.
Cost isn't much different from the basic Paxton vs. the Roe. The Roe is a do it your selfer and the Paxton isn't, atleast in my case. I chose the Paxton due to the future hp potential. |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT NEVER SAW A TWIN TURBO AND SUPERCHARGER IN ONE CAR! | VIPER D | Driven | 18 | 06-21-2006 09:59 PM |
| Heffner Twin Turbo vs Supercharger | Real Hummer | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 28 | 01-16-2006 04:35 PM |
| Turbo/supercharger systems | GTS Bruce | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 10 | 06-19-2005 07:11 PM |
| What do you think of this concept??? Twin Turbo/Supercharger | utahviper | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 0 | 04-01-2003 11:42 AM |
| Turbo or Supercharger? | Chuck 98 RT/10 | Performance Modifications | 23 | 02-07-2002 07:06 PM |
