|
|
|
| Forums | Media Gallery | Classifieds | Chat | Membership | Marketplace | How-Tos |
| |||||||
| Register | All Albums | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| RT/10 and GTS Discussions (1992-2002) For technical and general questions and discussions related to the GEN I/II RT/10, GTS, and ACR Vipers (1992-2002). Sponsored by: Doug Levin Motorsports |
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Title says it all in 2007 2001 GTS was dynoed at 438.57 hp/481.79 torque,at the time car had straight exhaust ,no cats or mufflers.
2008 car was dynoed at 409.93 hp/445.67 torque Changes since 2007: 3.55 gears 3" highflow cats/catback exhaust roe sct flash An additional 3-5 thousand miles One other note plugs and wires were changed before run in 2007 have not been changed since. I won the prestigious KCVCA's runt of the litter award,and while I am honored I would prefer not to repeat
__________________
"Any society that would give up a little freedom to gain a little security will deserve neither and loose both." Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
VCA Member
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: LA, California
Posts: 2,082
|
Your car is an 01 which means its a creampuff, so your original reading of 438/481 was just wrong. An honest dyno will show 395-405 for any 2000+ gen 2 in stock form, any more than that and I suggest going to a different dyno shop.
Your new dyno runs are in line with a 2000+ with slight mods. Also don't forget it is not uncommon to loose 5-10rwhp with shorter gears. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
open to anything but the car was run several times and these numbers were consistent.
several other 2000 + cars were run the same day and their numbers were reasonably close to this cars numbers,for what it is worth
__________________
"Any society that would give up a little freedom to gain a little security will deserve neither and loose both." Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
VA/MD VCA Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Laplata, Maryland
Posts: 588
|
So the first number is with straight pipes, no mufflers, no cats, and then you installed mufflers and cats and lost 29 HP (on different dynos and different years) ? Are you suprized? Installing cats and mufflers to a straight pipe exhaust isn't an "upgrade" it's a "downgrade".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
same dyno? and what kind?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Yep, besids the variant in dynos you are going to LOSE some power when going from NO exhaust to cats and mufflers. Add that to the fact that you LOSE a few with the addition of gears and there you have your answer. You may have gained a few torque. Did you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
and a leakdown test should be done if you're really worried about it. but id bet its a different dyno and the temp was warmer
__________________
510 Stroker, Greg Good heads, DLM Paxton, Rebuilt and Tuned by DLM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
My near stock Gen 2... (tubes, filters, cat-back) Baseline '01 GTS - I'm running rich? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2008 VIPER ACR 2009 CORVETTE ZR1 2009 NISSSAN GTR 2002 PORSCHE GT2 2005 FORD GT 1968 GSS HEMI DART 1970 HEMICUDA 1967 CORVETTE L88 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
I agree: Cats and gears. The other possibility is that one set of results is corrected and the other is not. That can have an effect on the horsepower reading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Back to back the 3:55's reduce the dyno hp by 3%
__________________
94 RT/10 (Red-Tan), 99 GTS-ACR (Red) sold, 06 SRT-10 Red/Silver (RIP #101215) 06 SRT-Coupe (Red/Silver) sold, 08 SRT-ACR-C (Red/Silver) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
+4 on the exhaust 'downgrade'
both runs were done on the same dyno? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Quote:
Fast forward to your recent run. Your numbers are almost exactly what my 98 car made with K&Ns and Smooth Tubes, w/ stock exhaust. If the SCT tune does what the tuners say it should be doing your power curve should have a lot more meat in the low and mid range, but your peak numbers should only be up 10-15whp. Do you have both dyno charts? As others have said you will experience a loss in WHP on the dyno with the gear change. I think something is a little off, but not way off. You should currently be making right around your inflated numbers from your first set of dyno runs in 2007.
__________________
98 Red GTS - Mods 98 Red GTS - SOLD Last edited by CROM; 05-11-2008 at 09:06 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
S. Fla. VCA Member
Site Sponsor Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Miami Beach, Florida.
Posts: 989
|
I suspect the exhaust may have traded off some horsepower and the gears will scrub some of the hp numbers as well.
I would suggest to take a trip back to the dyno and see if you can remove the SCT program, dyno the car, and then reflash the PCM with the SCT and re-dyno. This will provide you with better +/- comparison hp numbers "same day, same place" Best of luck! Doug
__________________
************************ Doug Levin Motorsports Inc.: www.douglevinmotorsports.com 305 249-RACE (7223) N.M.B., Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Thanks for the info,car will go back in the next couple of weeks and I am going to remove the program and run etc...The dyno is the same dyno/location as last year temps etc were nearly identical.I know nothing about dyno's so I can only take everyones advice and start w/o program and work up from there.The new run does show car making power earlier and then tapering off,which explains the feeling of the car being stronger.
__________________
"Any society that would give up a little freedom to gain a little security will deserve neither and loose both." Benjamin Franklin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I've had two 2000 ACR's built on the same day. The first car made 424 RWHP with a Corsa cat back only. The second car had a Corsa cat back + high flow cats + 3:55 gears and made 424 RWHP as well. I think the the 3:55's offset the gain at the cats. With my current conf. the removal of the high flow cats only netted 5 RWHP at 585 RWHP! Really no good reason not to run cats. Corsa claims about 18 RWHP on a 2000 GTS. That puts both cars at 406 RWHP bone stock, if you want to believe Corsa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Harvey, La.
Posts: 374
|
It's the gears! When my car dyno'd 604 rwhp on 3:73 gears Sean Roe told me it would dyno closer to 640 on the stock ratio. The gears change the way the dyno reads your power on the rollers. It also shows an increase in torque
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LOSS OF POWER | 622r109 | Performance Modifications | 8 | 09-21-2007 08:11 PM |
| Loss of Vacuum? | ViperTony | Gen II | 28 | 06-10-2007 08:32 AM |
| Loss of Power with the Roe SC?? | cayman | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 7 | 04-30-2007 11:01 PM |
| Upgrades? Massachusetts Upgrades? | FLX109 | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 4 | 08-30-2002 07:31 AM |
| How much H.P. loss with A/C on???? | 00prowler | RT/10 and GTS Discussions | 2 | 06-11-2002 08:01 AM |