| Forums | Media Gallery | Classifieds | Chat | Membership | Marketplace | How-Tos |
| |||||||
| Register | All Albums | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Sneaky Pete's Place The place to gather to swap stories about non-Viper related issues or events and to hold non-Viper related casual but serious discussions. Intended to be for the "non-jokers" of the community. Sponsored By: GP Motorsports "Arrive and Drive" |
![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 829
|
Man Dodge really dropped the ball on this one. First off the ugly nose of the car, Intrepid read end, but worse it's a 4 door!!!! At least GM knew better to put 4 doors on the GTO. Makes my '68 440R/T Charger look that much better.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....;page_number=1 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Viper owner
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,614
|
I couldn't agree with you more - this car is a disgusting pig. There are spy photos of a preproduction version of this car over on allpar.com and it looks just as ugly in real life as in the pages of a magazine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 1,437
|
The recessed and angled headlights don't help none. The black hood should come all the way down to the headlights and grill like the original, to make it look more complete. Rather than making it look like you got some junk yard hood with matte spray paint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A. (So. Bay), CA
Posts: 371
|
What the ___ *barf*...Whatever happened to that Charger concept a few years ago?
Scrapped? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 829
|
Quote:
The Concept looked BAD Azz, though it still had 4 doors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA
Posts: 304
|
See what happens when you let Bob Lutz leave? The new design is horrid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 663
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Well I couldn't agree more! Why put Lime green on it! It has to look somewhat better in Red, black , Sliver, yellow even!!Hope this isn't the final plan!! I'm Buying the 05 SRT Magnum with all wheel drive and the bigger Hemi. Model in Gaylord Texan hotel was really sharp! Bigger tires and rims awesome hood scoop!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The GTO is actually made in Australia and fully imported here. It is in fact a Holden Monaro.
Just thought I would throw that into the mix..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Charger Concept was a good looking car.
If this is final way a new charger looks they need to fire the design team, it looks like a 300 or a Magnum. Eeewwwww. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: L.A. (So. Bay), CA
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
VCA Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: San Diego, CA. USA
Posts: 3,252
|
2005 Chrysler 300
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Past National President
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Burr Ridge, IL
Posts: 2,366
|
Lutz was gone before that concept Charger came out. The loss was Tom Gale, he was a BIG fan of the original concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
POS! They must be saving a ton money hiring a retarded design team.
Make the original concept Charger and bring back a good looking Cuda. Lets put Dodge way out in front. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Colorado Track Day 2006 May 10th 2006 | SnakeInTheGulf | General Viper Discussion | 0 | 04-03-2006 04:34 PM |
| Colorado Track Day 2006 May 10th 2006 | SnakeInTheGulf | VCA Viper Events and Gatherings | 0 | 04-03-2006 04:34 PM |
| 2006 Dodge Charger Daytona R/T | SRT10 | Driven | 25 | 02-16-2005 10:47 AM |
| 2006 Charger and Nascar replica on Ebay | Cris | Sneaky Pete's Place | 8 | 02-03-2005 06:36 PM |
| SRT not a ugly as the BMW Z4 !!!! | Dixter | Sneaky Pete's Place | 9 | 12-15-2002 12:20 AM |